Apple iPhone X screen-to-body ratio compared
Calling the new
breed of phones “bezel-less” is a bit of a misnomer – they do have a bezel,
just much smaller than traditional phones. Still, it’s how they’ve come to be
known and now even Apple makes one. But screen to body numbers get thrown
around and some of them are not quite accurate.
Things like rounded
corners and display cutouts make things yet more complicated, but we took the
time to calculate the actual numbers, accounting for all the deviations from
the classic rectangular screen.
So here it is. The Apple iPhone X measures
among the best. However, even the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2, the sequel to the phone
that started this craze (though not the first bezel-less phone) isn’t on top.
That honor falls to the LG V30.
Screen to body ratio
|
|
Apple iPhone X
|
81.49%
|
LG V30
|
83.24%
|
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
|
82.63%
|
If you’re wondering how the Mi Mix 2 fell
from the top, it’s about proportion. The original had a 6.4” screen, this one
has a 5.99” screen. So while the bezels have about the same thickness, they are
measured against a smaller screen.
Also note that the official images of the Mix
2 are quite misleading – they show a phone with an 88.8% screen to body ratio,
a 7.5% exaggeration by Xiaomi.
We have to say that the usable area on the
iPhone X is slightly less than the 81.49% number suggests – the two “horns” on
top are only good for notifications but not content. We’ll compare the Super
Retina Display’s surface area to a traditional 16:9 screen in the next article.
PS. in case you're wondering why the Galaxy
S8/Note8 were not included, it's because the curved sides of their screens make
such measurements quite difficult.
Source: gsmarena